USPTO serial 87132570
SHARP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5336423Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 14, 2017
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SHARP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha TA Sharp Corporation
Osaka, JP
Other trademarks owned by Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha TA Sharp Corporation
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha TA Sharp Corporation
Osaka, JP
Other trademarks owned by Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha TA Sharp Corporation
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha TA Sharp Corporation
Osaka, JP
Other trademarks owned by Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha TA Sharp Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
DONNA J. BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.901 NORTH GLEBE ROAD, 11TH FLOORARLINGTON, VA 22203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | self-propelled security systems in the nature of robots with video surveillance cameras, chemical sensors, loudspeakers and burglar alarms; video surveillance cameras; chemical sensors for activating security systems against attack; chemical sensors for detecting various stimuli in the nature of vapors and odors; chemical sensors for measuring chemical levels in the air; loudspeakers; burglar alarms | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2017 |
| 037 | repair and maintenance services for self-propelled security systems in the nature of robots with video surveillance cameras, chemical sensors, loudspeakers and burglar alarms; repair and maintenance services for video surveillance cameras, chemical sensors, loudspeakers, burglar alarms | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha TA Sharp Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha TA Sharp Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha TA Sharp Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named SHARP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 28, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |