USPTO serial 87132662
NUERA HOTELS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUERA HOTELS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Goldman
STEPHEN B GOLDMAN LENNER DAVID LITTENBERG KRUMHOLZ & ME600 SOUTH AVENUE WESTWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Hotel management for others; Administrative hotel management; Association services, namely, promoting diversity in the restaurant and hotel industries on behalf of employees, vendors, management, and owners; Business management of hotels; Business management of hotels for others; Managing and operating resort hotels and business conference centers of others; Providing price comparison services in the field of Hotels via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Real estate hotel development and construction of hotel property | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Online transportation reservation services for hotels; Providing room service delivery services to hotels and condominiums | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Hotel accommodation services; Hotel and motel services; Hotel and restaurant services; Hotel services; Hotel services for preferred customers; Hotel, bar and restaurant services; Hotel, motel, restaurant, bar and catering services; Hotels; Hotel, restaurant and bar services; Hotel, restaurant and catering services; Hotels; Making hotel reservations for others; Making reservations and bookings for others for accommodations and meals at Hotels; Providing hotel accommodation; Providing a website featuring information in the field of hotels and temporary accommodations for travelers; Providing extended-stay hotels; Providing information and advice on hotels and restaurants to tourists and business travelers; Providing on-line reviews of restaurants and hotels; Providing personalized information about hotels and temporary accommodations for travel via the Internet; Providing temporary accommodation at Hotels; Providing temporary accommodation at pensions; Providing temporary lodging services in the nature of a condominium hotel; Providing travel lodging information services and travel lodging booking agency services for travelers; Reservation of hotel rooms for travelers; Reservation of hotel rooms for travellers; Residential hotel services; Resort hotel services; Restaurant and hotel services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Hotel concierge services; Personal concierge services for others comprising making requested personal arrangements and reservations, running errands and providing customer specific information to meet individual needs, all rendered in business establishments, office buildings, hotels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Core Development Holdings Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Core Development Holdings Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named NUERA HOTELS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2017 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |