USPTO serial 87132734
TIMBER CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TIMBER CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur Schaier
ARTHUR SCHAIER CARMODY TORRANCE SANDAK & HENNESSEY LLP195 CHURCH STREETPO BOX 1950NEW HAVEN, CT 06509Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | organizing exhibitions for the promotion of urban mass timber construction and carbon sequestration; providing an internet website featuring news and information in the field of natural resource management relating to the environment; promoting collaboration within the scientific, research and provider communities to achieve advances in the field of mass timber construction; promoting public interest and awareness of carbon sequestration through urban mass timber construction | ACTIVE | Oct 6, 2015 |
| 041 | conducting educational exhibitions in the nature of timber construction; education services, namely, providing mentoring, classes and seminars in the field of timber construction; organizing exhibitions in the field of timber construction and architecture | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2014 |
| 042 | architectural design; research on building construction or city planning; research and development and consultation related thereto in the field of mass timber in cities; consulting services in the field of architectural design; architectural research; providing scientific information in the fields of climate change and global warming; providing a website featuring information about green architecture, sustainable community planning and infrastructure development; research in the field of climate change; research in the reduction of carbon emissions; research in the field of natural resources; architectural services; providing a website featuring information in the field of architectural design; providing an internet website portal featuring information in the field of architecture; providing an internet website portal featuring information in the field of urban design | ACTIVE | Oct 6, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |