Drawing for VIDI TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 87133214

VIDI TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIDI TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Massimo Travagli

888 Biscayne Blvd, 2004Miami, FL 33132

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Mobile computers; Mobile telephonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 18, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2018FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Nov 9, 2018ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Nov 6, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 27, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 11, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 8, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 23, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 27, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 27, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 27, 2017DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2017DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance