Drawing for NO DRAMA LLAMA

USPTO serial 87135611

NO DRAMA LLAMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NO DRAMA LLAMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Meredith Frank Mendez,

MEREDITH FRANK MENDEZ, MALLOY & MALLOY, P.L.2800 S.W. 3RD AVENUEMIAMI, FL 33129UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009sunglassesACTIVE—
018athletic gear, namely, athletic bagsACTIVE—
025clothing, namely, t-shirts, hats, yoga pants, athletic gear, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts and pantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 5, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 6, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 4, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 4, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2017NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 9, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 3, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2016CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 25, 2016CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Nov 23, 2016CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Nov 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance