Drawing for PEOPLE SCIENCE

USPTO serial 87135968

PEOPLE SCIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEOPLE SCIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rhett V. Barney

RHETT V. BARNEY LEE & HAYES, PLLC601 WEST RIVERSIDE, SUITE 1400SPOKANE, WA 99201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing business planning solutions, business consulting and business advisory services, all for aligning business operations with enterprise visions and goalsACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that integrates and incorporates relevant industry expertise for collecting, processing, and presenting data gathered from everyday workplace activities across a company; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that integrates and incorporates relevant industry expertise for providing insights and information on workplace productivity; providing consulting services regarding use of software as a service (SaaS) programing to develop, align, and execute on enterprise visions and goals and to increase overall company performanceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 5, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 4, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 9, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 23, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance