Drawing for CARBON WARFARE

USPTO serial 87136167

CARBON WARFARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARBON WARFARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Curt Handley, Esquire

CURT HANDLEY, Esquire LAW OFFICE OF CURT HANDLEY19540 BUCKINGHAM DR. SUITE 1MOKENA, IL 60448UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video game cartridges and discs; Video game software; Video and computer game programs; Interactive video game programs; Protective display screen covers adapted for use with phones and handheld computersACTIVE—
041Entertainment services in the nature of development, creation, production, distribution, and post-production of films, motion pictures, and animated films; Organization of sports competitions; Entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of ongoing television programs in the field of fantasy, action, and science fiction; Providing a website featuring entertainment information in the fields of electronic game programs, electronic game products, and electronic game programs and productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 26, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance