Drawing for KETO//KOFFEE

USPTO serial 87138792

KETO//KOFFEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KETO//KOFFEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kyle Citrynell

Kyle Citrynell Seiller Waterman, LLC462 S. Fourth St., 22nd FloorLouisville, KY 40202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary and nutritional supplements containing ketonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 13, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 13, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 30, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 14, 2018ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 10, 2018RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Aug 2, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 26, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 3, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 23, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 23, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 24, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 24, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 24, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance