USPTO serial 87139187
WHERE WATER WORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 10, 2018
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with WHERE WATER WORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Brown
Jeffrey H. Brown MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP444 W. Lake Street, Suite 3200Chicago, IL 60606United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business development services in the field of water technology; technology commercialization assistance, namely, consulting services in the field of export, procurement, and new business formation; promoting the exchange of information and resources within the scientific research and development communities to achieve advancement in the field of water use and technology; promoting economic development in the county of Milwaukee, Wisconsin | ACTIVE | Mar 2, 2017 |
| 036 | Rental of office space; technology commercialization assistance, namely, consulting services in the field of angel investment | ACTIVE | Oct 2, 2017 |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops in the field of water technology; education and training, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops in the field of angel investment; mentoring programs in the field of water technology | ACTIVE | Sep 12, 2017 |
| 042 | Research and development in the field of water and water technology; innovation consulting services, namely, advising others in the areas of product development in the field of water and water technology; providing technological information about water technology; technological planning and consulting services in the field of water; providing an online database featuring content in the field of water research and innovation; technology commercialization assistance, namely, consulting services in the field of product development | ACTIVE | Sep 26, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Water Council, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Water Council, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Water Council, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WHERE WATER WORKS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 7, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |