USPTO serial 87139917
Serial No. 87139917
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNKLEMAN, SARAH E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 87139917?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B.G. Horowitz,
ROBERT B.G. HOROWITZ, Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller Plaza, 14th FloorNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | cinematographic projectors; movie projectors; photographic projectors; projection apparatus; Televisions; DVD players and recorders; optical disc players and recorders; digital audio players and recorders; digital video players and recorders; portable digital audio players; smart phones; portable telephones; digital cameras; video cameras; head mounted video displays; tablet computers; notebook computers; laptop computers; computers; downloadable image, video and music files for use in connection with projecting images on projection screens, walls, buildings, furniture, interior accessories and toys; computer software for use in connection with projecting images on projection screens, walls, buildings, furniture, interior accessories and toys | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | providing entertainment information via the Internet; arranging and planning of movies, shows, plays or musical performance; movie showing, movie film production, or movie film distribution; presentation of live show performances; direction or presentation of plays; providing entertainment facilities, namely, amusement parks; providing entertainment services, namely, conducting events consisting of projecting images on projection screens, walls, buildings, furniture, interior accessories and toys; Rental of cinematographic projectors, movie projectors and photographic projectors | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing computer software for use in connection with projecting images on projection screens, walls, buildings, furniture, interior accessories and toys; hosting of e-commerce platforms on the Internet; maintenance of software used in the field of e-commerce; provision or rental of electronic storage space on the Internet in the field of e-commerce; provision of multimedia contents for projection of images on projection screens, walls, buildings, furniture, interior accessories and toys; computer graphic design services, namely, creation of projection images | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 16, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 16, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 16, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |