Drawing for MESH

USPTO serial 87140303

MESH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MESH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sevag Demirjian

Sevag Demirjian Foundation Law Group LLP4605 Lankershim Blvd., Suite 650North Hollywood, CA 91602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Headphones; earbuds; wireless speakers; cellular phones; recorded software for selecting of sound frequencies, sound source directions and amplification and attenuation thereof; recorded computer operating programs; downloadable computer programs for selecting of sound frequencies and sound source directions and amplification and attenuation thereof; wired and wireless communication protocol products and devices, namely, devices for the transmission and receiving of voice, data and video streams across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols; computer and data networking products and devices, namely, computer network hubs and switches; radio signal relay products and devices; amplification products and devices; transmission products and devices, namely, apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images; all the foregoing excluding usage in the fields of social and business events, activities, travel and electronic business transactions servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 10, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
May 10, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 10, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2021EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 13, 2021EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 13, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 17, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 17, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 21, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 21, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 21, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 17, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 30, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 23, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2019PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 18, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 16, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 2, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 29, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance