Drawing for LIVE GAMEFULLY

USPTO serial 87140523

LIVE GAMEFULLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVE GAMEFULLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas K. Cox

THOMAS K. COX MCCARTHY DUFFY LLP180 N. LASALLE STREET, SUITE 2300CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer interactive game software downloadable from a global computer network; interactive multimedia computer program for personal analysis and for playing interactive computer games in the fields of personal health and wellness, personal development, personal discovery and personal fulfillmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2018PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Feb 8, 2018ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2018PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 19, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 16, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2018PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 12, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 15, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 13, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 12, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 18, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 16, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance