Drawing for ATLANTIC WIND AW FINEST QUALITY ORIGINAL EXPORT

USPTO serial 87140880

ATLANTIC WIND AW FINEST QUALITY ORIGINAL EXPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ATLANTIC WIND AW FINEST QUALITY ORIGINAL EXPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marius J. Jason

MARIUS J. JASON AAA PATENDIBÜROO OÜTARTU MNT 16TALLINN, 10117ESTONIA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages containing fruit; Alcoholic beverages, except beer; Alcoholic essences; Alcoholic extracts; Anise; Aperitifs; Arak; Brandy; Curacao; Fruit extracts, alcoholic; Gin; Hard cider; Hydromel; Kirsch; Liqueurs; Nira; Peppermint liqueurs; Perry; Piquette; Pre-mixed alcoholic beverages, other than beer-based; Prepared alcoholic cocktail; Rice alcohol; Rum; Sake; Spirits; Spirits and liqueurs; Vodka; Whisky; Wine; Alcoholic bitters; Anise; Spirits and liqueursACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 12, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 24, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 31, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 4, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 30, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2017FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Sep 20, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 20, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 2, 2017ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
May 26, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 26, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 26, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 26, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 26, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance