Drawing for SNAP FUNNEL

USPTO serial 87144063

SNAP FUNNEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOLODNER, LOUIS FRANCIS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNAP FUNNEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jack Baldini,

JACK BALDINI BALDINI LAW LLC37 BOWERS DRIVEHACKETTSTOWN, NJ 07840UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Funnels; Household utensils, namely, specialized funnels with a small diameter inner bottom opening and a larger diameter bottom outer ring specially adapted to stabilize the utensil to various size bottles that also acts as a pour spout; Household utensils, namely, silicone funnels; Pouring spouts for household useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 19, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 19, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 4, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 29, 2018RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Aug 8, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 25, 2018RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Feb 25, 2018RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2018RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Feb 5, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 5, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 5, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 4, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 4, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance