USPTO serial 87144320
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Culver City, CA
Culver City, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine K. Au-Yeung
CHRISTINE K. AU-YEUNG WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL ROADPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game programs and entertainment software for use on mobile and cellular phones for capturing, processing, assembly and producing virtual and augmented reality and three-dimensional (3D) content from and within the mobile or cellular phone | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 19, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |