Drawing for HOLO BY 8I

USPTO serial 87144320

HOLO BY 8I

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NOVAKOVIC, MIROSLAV
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOLO BY 8I?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine K. Au-Yeung

CHRISTINE K. AU-YEUNG WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL ROADPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game programs and entertainment software for use on mobile and cellular phones for capturing, processing, assembly and producing virtual and augmented reality and three-dimensional (3D) content from and within the mobile or cellular phoneACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 10, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 10, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 10, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 6, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 6, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 4, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 4, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 17, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 5, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 27, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 27, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 19, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 19, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 14, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 14, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance