USPTO serial 87144454
WILLIAMS FAMILY KITCHEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRER PEREZ, PAUL ANTHONY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WILLIAMS FAMILY KITCHEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa Gates
LISA GATES BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP300 E. RANDOLPH STREETSUITE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Flatware, namely, butcher and pruning knives, dessert and salad forks, table forks, table knives, dessert spoons, coffee spoons, tablespoons, fish and cold meat forks, fish forks, fish knives, sauce spoons, mocha spoons, dessert knives, and butter knives | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electric coffee percolators | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Cookbooks | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Potholders; serving utensils, namely, serving spoons, serving forks and soup ladles; cooking pots and pans; baking dishes; serving dishes; food storage jars; non-electric coffee percolators; small hand-operated kitchen utensils, namely, pepper mills, corkscrews, graters, mashers, juicers, rolling pins, whisks and mixers | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Kitchen towels | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Caviar, smoked fish, cheese, dried fruits, dry roasted nuts, namely, almonds, cashews, peanuts; dry roasted mixed nuts; salami, roast beef, chicken liver mousse, duck mousse, pork and liver pate, goose liver, sausage, smoked chicken breasts, smoked turkey breasts, smoked ham, smoked Peking duck breasts, poultry, namely, ostrich, quail, pheasant, meat products, namely, weisswurst, bratwurst, knockwurst and Vienna sausage; potato chips, sweet potato chips, infused olive oil, flavored olive oil, dried vegetables, antipasto | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Barbecue sauce, pasta sauces, pasta, pretzels, chocolate covered pretzels, flavored pretzels, chocolate covered nuts, nougat with nuts, maple syrup, infused maple syrup, flavored maple syrup, pancake mix, scone mix, cookie mix, brownie mix, cake mix, candy, cocoa, chocolate candy, capers, coffee, espresso drinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juices, fruit beverages, bottled drinking water | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Wine | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services, café services, delicatessen services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dean & DeLuca Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named WILLIAMS FAMILY KITCHEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 20, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |