Drawing for SIMPLICITY BY DESIGN

USPTO serial 87145743

SIMPLICITY BY DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLICITY BY DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Abhyanker

Raj Abhyanker LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.446 E Southern Ave.Tempe, CA 85282UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes and seminars in the field of personal improvement; Life coaching services in the field of personal improvement and setting and meeting personal goals; Providing a website featuring educational information relating to classes, seminars, and life coaching services in the field of self improvementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 29, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 10, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 10, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 28, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 27, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 20, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 7, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance