USPTO serial 87146426
SPOONABLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPOONABLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas D. Foster
THOMAS D. FOSTER TDFOSTER - INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW11622 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared ready-to-eat and packaged meals consisting primarily of legumes; Prepared ready-to-eat and packaged meals consisting primarily of vegetables; Prepared ready-to-eat and packaged meals consisting primarily of fruits; Prepared ready-to-eat and packaged salads consisting primarily of legumes; Prepared ready-to-eat and packaged salads consisting primarily of vegetables; Prepared ready-to-eat and packaged salads consisting primarily of fruits; Legumes-based snack food; Vegetable-based snack food; Fruit-based snack food; Chia-based snack food; Soups; Snack food dips consisting primarily of legumes; Snack food dips consisting primarily of vegetables; Snack food dips consisting primarily of fruits; Snack food dips consisting primarily of nuts; Ready to eat, food bars consisting primarily of legumes; Ready to eat, food bars consisting primarily of vegetables; Ready to eat, food bars consisting primarily of fruits; Ready to eat, food bars consisting primarily of seeds; Ready to eat, food bars consisting primarily of nuts | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Ready to eat, food bars consisting primarily of ancient grains; Prepared ready-to-eat and packaged meals consisting primarily of ancient grains; Prepared ready-to-eat and packaged salads consisting primarily of ancient grains; Ancient grain-based snack food | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit-based non-dairy smoothies; Vegetable-based non-dairy smoothies; Fruit drinks and juices; Vegetable-fruit juices; Vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |