Drawing for REVFORCE

USPTO serial 87146816

REVFORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, IN PYO
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with REVFORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTOPHER D. KEIRS

CHRISTOPHER D KEIRS BLANK ROME LLP717 TEXAS AVESUITE 1400HOUSTON, TX 77002

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, software extensions for the integration of revenue recognition computer programs with customer relationship management computer programsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2017MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 1, 2017ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 1, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 1, 2017OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 8, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 7, 2017OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 3, 2017ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Feb 23, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance