Drawing for KALASHNIKOV USA

USPTO serial 87146961

KALASHNIKOV USA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KALASHNIKOV USA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALLAN Z LITOVSKY

ALLAN Z LITOVSKY THE LITOVSKY LAW FIRM18685 MAIN ST 101-181HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013Firearm attachments, namely, modular external rail systems for firearms; Firearm attachments, namely, modular external rail systems for attaching accessories to firearms; Firearm attachments, namely, mounts for attaching accessories to a firearm; Firearm attachments, namely, mounts for attaching ancillary equipment to a firearm; Firearm attachments, namely, mounts for attaching grips to a firearm; Firearm attachments, namely, mounts for attaching gun sights to a firearm; Firearm attachments, namely, mounts for attaching laser pointing devices to a firearm; Firearm hand guards; Firearm tactical rails; Firearms; Ammunition for firearms; Covers for firearms; Foresights for firearms; Monopods for firearms; Muzzle-loading firearmsACTIVEJun 1, 2015
028Airsoft guns for recreational purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 24, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 18, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 13, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2018AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2018PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 31, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 30, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 25, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance