CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for M

USPTO serial 87147150

M

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leo G. Lenna

LEO G LENNA SORELL LENNA & SCHMIDT LLP99 SMITHTOWN BYPASS 2ND FLOORHAUPPAUGE, NY 11788UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020mattresses, namely crib mattresses, mattress foundations and mattress toppersACTIVEJun 1, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 18, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 18, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 3, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 25, 2019LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 25, 2019LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jun 10, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 7, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 5, 2019RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 4, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 22, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 22, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 18, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 12, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Oct 12, 2018PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Oct 9, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 28, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 28, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 7, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 9, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance