USPTO serial 87147974
JESUS VR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JESUS VR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Regina, SASKATCHEWAN, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Ambrogi
John L. Ambrogi Latimer LeVay Fyock LLC55 West Monroe StreetSuite 1100Chicago, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motion picture films about significant historical and contemporary events; digital versatile discs, DVDs and high definition digital discs featuring music, motion pictures about significant historical and contemporary events, and television programs about significant historical and contemporary events, as well as downloadable audio recordings featuring music, and downloadable video recordings, namely, motion pictures about significant historical and contemporary events, television programs about significant historical and contemporary events; virtual reality digital game software for use with computers, cell phones, smartphones, tablet computers, handheld computers, game consoles, electronic game streaming devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Virtual reality goggles and virtual reality headsets and helmets adapted for use in playing video games; virtual reality goggles, headsets and helmets for use with virtual reality digital game software that is used with computers, cell phones, smartphones, tablet computers, handheld computers, game consoles, and electronic game streaming devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Distribution of motion picture films; Production of DVDs featuring music, motion pictures about significant historical and contemporary events, and television programs about significant historical and contemporary events, as well as downloadable audio recordings featuring music, and downloadable video recordings, namely, motion pictures about significant historical and contemporary events, television programs about significant historical and contemporary events, and video clips about motion picture about significant historical and contemporary events, and television entertainment, namely, production of television programs about significant historical and contemporary events | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of virtual reality digital game software for use with computers, cell phones, smartphones, tablet computers, handheld computers, game consoles, electronic game streaming devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Autumn IP Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named JESUS VR
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |