Drawing for HORNETSECURITY

USPTO serial 87148936

HORNETSECURITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HORNETSECURITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony V. Lupo

ANTHONY V. LUPO ARENT FOX LLP1717 K STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer anti-virus software; Computer software for encryption; Computer software for use in the encryption and decryption of digital files, including audio, video, text, binary, still images, graphics and multimedia files; Software for ensuring the security of electronic mail; VPN (virtual private network) operating softwareACTIVE—
038Communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers, not in the fields of aerospace or defense; Internet Service Provider services, not in the fields of aerospace or defenseACTIVE—
042Computer safeguard services, not in the fields of aerospace or defense, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media, individuals, and facilities; Information technology protection services, namely, enforcing, restricting, and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources for cloud, mobile, or network resources, not in the fields of aviation or defense; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Computer services, namely, computer system administration for others; Online computer services, namely, providing spam filtering services to protect websites and online applications from receiving unsolicited messages; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for protecting computers and networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 27, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 27, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 26, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 8, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2016AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance