USPTO serial 87149450
REMOTE CONTROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUO, EMILY M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REMOTE CONTROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yuri Chumak
YURI CHUMAK CHUMAK & COMPANY LLP1201 DUNDAS ST. E., SUITE 201TORONTO, M4M1S2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | consulting services in the fields of design, development and production of corporate identities, branding, and promotional and advertising literature and material; marketing consulting services, namely, providing consultation and direction on marketing and branding ideas; advertising agency services, namely, developing, designing and executing advertising campaigns, preparing advertising copy, namely, copy writing for advertising; preparing advertisements for others; Advertising services for the wares and services of others; promotion services, namely, developing promotional campaigns for the business of others; consulting services in the field the promotion of the goods and services of others; marketing services, namely, development of marketing strategies for others, arranging for the distribution of the products of others, evaluating markets for existing products and services of others; market research and market analysis; publicity agency services; public relations services; direct marketing and mail preparation services for third parties | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | commercial printing services, namely, printing of consumer packaging, printing of labels; screen printing services; print production services; binding services for others, namely, binding of printed loose-leaf materials products and binding services for others, namely, binding of books; typesetting; color separation services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | online electronic publishing of books and periodicals; photography; desktop publishing for others; film-making, namely, motion picture film production; digital photography, namely, digital imaging services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | graphic art design services; packaging design services; consulting services in the field of design, development and production of product packaging; website consulting and design services, namely, design of websites, online applications and applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pulp & Fiber Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REMOTE CONTROL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |