USPTO serial 87149794
ONE12
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- QUEEN, ESTHER FELICIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONE12?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Stewart-Mekdara
DANA STEWART-MEKDARA GLOBAL TRADEMARKS, INC.505 S. VILLA REAL DRIVE, SUITE 102ANAHEIM HILLS, CA 92807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advice and information concerning commercial business management; Advisory services relating to business management and business operations; Analyses and appraisals of enterprises; Assistance and advice regarding business organization and management; Assistance to industrial or commercial enterprises in the running of their business; Assistance with business management and planning; Assistance, advice and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management and business organization relating to purchasing functions; Assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management, and business organization; Assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management, business organization, and customer analysis; Business advice and commercial information; Business assistance, management and information services; Business consulting and business information for enterprises; Business consulting, management, planning and supervision; Business management assistance to industrial or commercial companies; Business management consultancy as well as development of processes for the analysis and the implementation of strategy plans and management projects; Business management planning; Business management and organization consultancy; Business organization and operation consultancy; Business planning; Commercial consultancy; Commercial feasibility studies; Commercial management; Commercial and industrial management assistance; Computer-assisted business information and research services; Consultancy regarding the organization or managing of a trade company; Economic consulting and information for the industrial and commercial sectors for planning, organizing, monitoring and carrying out unique and complex projects in different sectors of one or several companies; Information in business matters; Information, advisory and consultancy services relating to business and management or business administration, including such services provided on line or via the internet; Planning concerning business management, namely, searching for partners for amalgamations and business take-overs as well as for business establishments; Providing business management information in connection with consulting and advisory services in the field of strategic planning; Providing information and analysis in the fields of economics and business | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |