Drawing for ENLIGHTEN

USPTO serial 87150558

ENLIGHTEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5538109Status 705Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 14, 2018
Examiner
HACK, ANDREA R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 705 means a Madrid-based U.S. registration has accepted Section 71 maintenance and Section 15 incontestability. The U.S. extension is active with strengthened rights. Track next renewal deadlines in TSDR and WIPO records.

Status 705: Status 705 means a Madrid-based U.S. registration has accepted Section 71 maintenance and Section 15 incontestability. The U.S. extension is active with strengthened rights.

Need help with ENLIGHTEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SATO, Masaru

SATO, Masaru Sato & Associates3-6-11 Ariake, Koto-ku,TFT Bldg. East 9FTokyo, 135-8071

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in developing real-time computer graphics; computer software for use in developing computer graphics in computer games and video games; computer software development kits for use in developing real-time computer graphics and computer games and video games; [ downloadable electronic publications, namely, instruction manuals, user manuals, technical manuals, development manuals, datasheets, brochures, articles, newsletters, books, magazines, journals, research papers and white papers all relating to computer software for use in developing real-time computer graphics, ] computer software for use in developing computer graphics in computer games and video games and computer software development kits for use in developing real-time computer graphics [ and computer games and video games ]ACTIVEDec 13, 2013
016[ Printed materials, namely, instruction manuals, user manuals, technical manuals, development manuals, datasheets, brochures, articles, newsletters, books, magazines, journals, research papers and white papers all relating to computer software for use in developing real-time computer graphics, computer software for use in developing computer graphics in computer games and video games and computer software development kits for use in developing real-time computer graphics and computer games and video games ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 13, 2013
042Design and development of computer software; design consultancy and services; computer programming; technical consultation and support services in the field of computer software for use in developing real-time computer graphics, computer software for use in developing computer graphics in computer games and video games and computer software development kits for use in developing real-time computer graphics and computer games and video gamesACTIVEDec 13, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2024NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2024C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 15, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 17, 2024E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2023REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jan 25, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 5, 2018ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 25, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 17, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance