USPTO serial 87150843
SAVI SS STYLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAVI SS STYLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Costa Mesa, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Rubber or silicon wristbands in the nature of a bracelet for holding hair ties therein; Rubber or silicon based finger wraps in the nature of a ring | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |