USPTO serial 87151428
SUGARSBAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUGARSBAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Hardman
THOMAS M. HARDMAN AUSTIN RAPP & HARDMAN170 SOUTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 735SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Licensing and association services in the field of restaurant services and retail services that feature low-sugar and sugar-free consumable food products and beverages; licensing and association services for others, namely, food processors, food manufacturers, restaurants, cafés, fast-food restaurants, and retail stores, to promote low-sugar and sugar-free food and drinks; licensing and association services for third parties; association services provided to restaurants and retail stores that feature low-sugar and sugar-free food and beverages, namely, advertising and promoting the sale, use and consumption of low-sugar and sugar-free food and beverages; franchising, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurants, food manufacturers, food processors, and retail stores providing low-sugar and sugar-free foods and drinks; association services provided to retail store, bar, restaurant, café, and fast-food restaurant services that feature low-sugar and sugar-free food and beverages; licensing of intellectual property to retail store services, restaurant services, and online retail store services for the promotion of sugar-free and low-sugar food products and drinks; licensing of association to restaurant services, café services, and retail services that provide low-sugar and sugar free consumable food products, including consumable food products for use in food preparation services, consumable food products for use in restaurants and retail stores, soft drinks, fruit drinks and fruit juices, soft drinks, namely, sodas, fruit-flavored carbonated drinks, smoothies, non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices, sports drinks and energy drinks, and concentrates, syrups, or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks, sports drinks, and energy drinks; licensing and association services for restaurant and retail industries that offer a wide variety of sugar-free and low-sugar food and drinks; retail bakery shops, restaurants, and food stores featuring low-sugar and sugar-free baked goods, desserts, foods, and beverages; licensing and association services for food and drink manufacturers and food and drink processors that feature sugar-free and low-sugar food and drink products; licensing and association services for café and restaurant services featuring low-sugar and sugar-free food entrees and drinks for consumption on or off the premises; licensing and association services for retail store services featuring sugar-free and low-sugar consumable food products and drinks; licensing and association services in the restaurant and retail industries featuring low-sugar food and beverages, sugar-free food and beverages, food and beverages featuring sugar substitutes, and no-sugar-added beverages and food products, all being derived from or based upon sugar-free principles and practices; association and licensing services for restaurants, food manufacturers, food processors, and retail stores featuring low-sugar and sugar-free consumable food products, drinks, and smoothies for health, detox, nutritional supplement, and weight loss | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |