Drawing for I PGH ART

USPTO serial 87151770

I PGH ART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I PGH ART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryan H. Opalko

BRYAN H OPALKO BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PCONE OXFORD CENTRE 20TH FLOOR301 GRANT STREETPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1410

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring handmade artisan products in the nature of original artwork in a wide variety of mediums; online retail store services featuring handmade artisan products in the nature of artwork in a wide variety of mediumsACTIVEAug 1, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 31, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 31, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 17, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 26, 2019RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Feb 1, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2019CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 9, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 9, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 10, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 10, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2018CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 18, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 25, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 25, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 8, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 10, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance