Drawing for CENTERLINE

USPTO serial 87151793

CENTERLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CENTERLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul P. Kriz

Paul P. Kriz Armis IP Law, LLCP.O. Box 1564Westborough, MA 01581UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Medical services, namely, services to deliver fluid to a recipient and services to deliver fluids, medication, or nutrients to a patient; medical services, namely, fluid delivery services via infusion of fluid to a recipient; medical services, namely, fluid delivery services; medical services, namely, services of guiding a caregiver to provide a correct dose of fluid to a recipient using one or more infusion pumps; medical services, namely, services of managing delivery of one or more infusions to a recipient; medical management, namely, services guiding a caregiver how to operate one or more infusion pumpsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 23, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 23, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 23, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 16, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 16, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 16, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Oct 23, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 23, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Apr 5, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 5, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2017NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 29, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 24, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 22, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 20, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 14, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
Jun 14, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 14, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
May 22, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 31, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance