Drawing for KONTROL

USPTO serial 87153503

KONTROL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KONTROL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth A. Knox

KENNETH A KNOX THOMAS HORSTEMEYER LLP3200 WINDY HILL RD SE STE 1600EATLANTA, GA 30339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Player-operated electronic video game controller accessories, namely, video game controller joystick, thumbstick, and control-pad extensionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 26, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 26, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 12, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 5, 2018RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jun 14, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 16, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 6, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 9, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 9, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 18, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 11, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance