Drawing for PURELUBE

USPTO serial 87154070

PURELUBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PURELUBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta L. Christensen

Roberta L. Christensen Koley Jessen P.C., L.L.O.1125 S 103rd StreetOne Pacific Place, Suite 800Omaha, NE 68124

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Hydraulic fluidACTIVEDec 31, 1991
004Gear oilsACTIVEDec 31, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 4, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 2, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 4, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 19, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 19, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 12, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 6, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 24, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance