USPTO serial 87154080
INTELLIGENCE AMPLIFIED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLIGENCE AMPLIFIED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erika L. Jenkins
ERIKA L. JENKINS POMEROY LAW GROUP PLLC54 WEST 40TH STREETNEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic financial analysis products and publications, namely, videos, webinars, podcasts, articles, journals, and reports providing critical and proprietary data, research, editorials, business intelligence, information, and analysis in the field of finance for the global investment management industry, asset owners, and custodians; downloadable financial software and computer applications for providing critical and proprietary data, research, editorials, business intelligence, information, and analysis in the field of finance for the global investment management industry, asset owners, and custodians; computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data relating to investment banking, mutual funds, social security, and individual retirement accounts | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, reports, newsletters, magazines, articles, journals, pamphlets, charts, and flyers, all containing critical and proprietary data, business intelligence, information, investment flow data, research, analytics, and editorials relating to investment banking, individual retirement accounts, mutual funds, and transaction cost analysis for the global investment management industry, asset owners, and custodians | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |