Drawing for HELI-WAVE

USPTO serial 87154195

HELI-WAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BURKE, JUSTINE N
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HELI-WAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Roberts

John Roberts Roberts IP Law6545 S Fort Apache Rd, Ste 135, # 102Las Vegas, NV 89148-6758UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs for controlling and operating computer numerical control machines for use in industrial pipe threading, namely, for use with automated thread-cutting machineryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 4, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance