Drawing for SAFE BRANDS SAFE ALLERGEN FREE ENVIRONMENT

USPTO serial 87154628

SAFE BRANDS SAFE ALLERGEN FREE ENVIRONMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFE BRANDS SAFE ALLERGEN FREE ENVIRONMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heather E. Balmat

HEATHER E BALMAT BALMAT LAW PLLC977 SEMINOLE TRAIL#342CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005nutritionally fortified water for medical purposes; nutritionally fortified beverages for medical purposes, health drinks, namely, dietary supplemental drinks, all of the foregoing produced in an allergen-free environmentACTIVE—
032health drinks, namely, vegetable juices and fruit juices, all of the foregoing produced in an allergen-free environmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 24, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 16, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 16, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 16, 2018EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Feb 12, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 8, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 8, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 8, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 8, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 15, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance