USPTO serial 87155107
BRIARVILLE PIPE REPAIR & RESTORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRIARVILLE PIPE REPAIR & RESTORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Palm Harbor, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Fried
2440 BROADWAY 219NEW YORK, NY 10024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Pipe cleaners for tobacco pipes; Pipe racks for tobacco pipes; Pipe cleaners for tobacco pipes; Pipe racks for tobacco pipes; Tobacco pipe cleaners; Absorbent paper for tobacco pipes; Fitted covers for tobacco pipes; Smoking pipe cleaners; Smoking pipe racks; Tobacco pipe cleaners | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2018 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |