USPTO serial 87156127
BEABA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUO, EMILY M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEABA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Beard clippers; Hand tools, namely, hand benders for use on pipes and conduits; Hand tools, namely, hand-operated device to aid with tying and untying knots; Hand tools, namely, hand-operated pumps; Hand tools, namely, hand-operated reaching devices for picking up and removing trash, litter and objects; Hand tools, namely, manually-operated sharpening wheels; Hand-operated tools for use in installing and removing toggle bolts; Hand-operated tools, namely, chisels; Pedicure sets; Spanners; Adjustable spanners; Chucks for hand-operated tools; Hand tools, namely, fruit pickers; Hand tools, namely, punches; Hand tools, namely, spatulas; Hand tools, namely, dicing blades, slitting blades, optically transparent blades, optically transmitting blades; Hand tools, namely, knife sharpeners; Hand tools, namely, manually-operated sharpening wheels; Hand-operated agricultural implements, namely, broadforks; Hand-operated agricultural implements, namely, chicken pluckers; Hand-operated agricultural implements, namely, cider presses; Hand-operated sharpening tools and instruments; Manually operated hand tool for crushing pipes; Manually operated sharpeners; Manually-operated edge sharpeners for skis and snowboards; Manually-operated razor blade sharpeners; Razor blades; Shaving blades; Socket spanner | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Alpenstocks; Backpacks; Clothing for pets; Haversacks; Leather, unwrought or semi-wrought; Pouch baby carriers; School bags; Sling bags for carrying infants; Travelling bags; Umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Beds for household pets; Cots; Cradles; Deck chairs; Footstools; Furniture; Infant walkers; Mats for infant playpens; Playpens for babies; Wall-mounted diaper changing platforms | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bed covers; Bed linen; Bed sheets; Bedspreads; Coverlets; Fabric, impervious to gases, for aeronautical balloons; Felt and non-woven textile fabrics; Felt cloth; Towels of textile; Upholstery fabrics; Wall hangings of textile; Unfitted coverings of plastic for furniture; Woven felt | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Babies' pants; Babies' trousers; Belts; Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, skirts, coats, suits, trousers; Footwear; Gloves; Gloves as clothing; Hats; Hosiery; Pants for babies, adults, children, women, men; Scarves; Waterproof jackets and pants; Baby layettes for clothing; Clothing layettes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Scale model vehicles; Snow globes; Stuffed toys; Toy pistols; Toy aircraft; Toy building blocks; Toy drones; Toy pistols; Toy robots; Toy vehicles; Toys, namely, children's dress-up accessories; Toys, namely, puppets and accessories therefor; Water wings; Baby rattles; Baby rattles incorporating teething rings; Baby multiple activity toys; Bendable toys; Children's multiple activity toys; Construction toys; Infant toys; Infant's rattles; Inflatable swimming pools; Inflatable toys; Play swimming pools; Plush toys; Pull toys; Punching toys; Push toys; Ride-on toys; Squeeze toys; Stuffed toys; Toy building blocks; Toy drones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADOR GROUP CO., LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BEABA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 25, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |