Drawing for TRIANGLE VEGFEST

USPTO serial 87156270

TRIANGLE VEGFEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BURKE, JUSTINE N
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRIANGLE VEGFEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gayle S. Boesky

217 W. 71ST STREET #5FNEW YORK, NY 10023-3754UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of cultural festivals featuring food, beverages, folk dance performances, live musical performances, dancing, parades, souvenirs, amusement rides, and entertainment activities for children and adults.; Organizing community festivals featuring primarily information to educate about the benefits of a plant-based diet and also providing a marketplace for vegan-friendly businesses to promote their offerings, and encourage local restaurants to offer vegan menu optionsACTIVEAug 6, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 22, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 21, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance