Drawing for THE SIGHTSEEINGPASS

USPTO serial 87156308

THE SIGHTSEEINGPASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SIGHTSEEINGPASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura J. Winston

LAURA J WINSTON KIM WINSTON LLP73 MARKET STREETSUITE 376YONKERS, NY 10710

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment ticket agency servicesACTIVEAug 16, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 8, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 8, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 27, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 12, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 12, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 12, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 2, 2018GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 2, 2018GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 2, 2018CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 2, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance