USPTO serial 87156334
ALL GOOD SPICE CO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOBO, DEBORAH E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALL GOOD SPICE CO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Delphine James
DELPHINE JAMES LAW OFFICE OF DELPHINE JAMES, PLLC2616 SOUTH LOOP WEST, STE. 415HOUSTON, TX 77054UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Spice blends; Spice mixes; Spice rubs; Spices; Spices in the form of powders; Baking spices; Dry spice rub for meats and fish; Edible spices; Instant spice blends; Natural spices; Organic spices; Pepper spice | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2018 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | CFDD | REQUEST TO CORRECT FILING DATE DENIED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | ERCF | TEAS REQUEST TO CHANGE FILING DATE. | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |