USPTO serial 87157055
ROSALIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROSALIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Scott
James L. Scott WARNER NORCROSS + JUDD LLP150 Ottawa Ave NW1500 Warner BuildingGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and computer application software for use by physicians to assist in selection of cancer treatment drugs; computer software and computer application software for use by physicians to generate output of cancer treatment drugs; Mobile application software to assist physicians in selection of cancer treatment drugs; mobile application software for use by physicians to generate output of cancer treatment drugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, reports for use by physicians to assist in selection of cancer treatment drugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to assist physicians in selection of cancer treatment drugs; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use by physicians to generate output of cancer treatment drugs; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software to assist physicians in selection of cancer treatment drugs; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use by physicians to generate output of cancer treatment drugs; Providing a website featuring information about software for use by physicians to assist in selection of cancer treatment drugs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Critical Outcome Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by COTINGA PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ROSALIND
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |