USPTO serial 87157232
OCEANWEAVE RECLAIMED FISHNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 7, 2020
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with OCEANWEAVE RECLAIMED FISHNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,275
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
British Columbia, CA
British Columbia, CA
British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel H. Landau
Daniel H. Landau Hayes Soloway P.C.4640 E Skyline DriveTucson, AZ 85718United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer bags for bicycles; tablet computer bags for bicycles; bags specially adapted for carrying smartphones and MP3 players bags for bicycles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Bicycle bags, namely, cycle bags in the nature of messenger bags specially adapted to be mounted on bicycles, pannier bags for bicycles, bicycle accessory bags in the nature of all-purpose carrying bags specially adapted to be mounted on bicycles; luggage racks for bicycles; bicycle handlebar luggage racks; rack trunk bags for bicycles; front and rear bicycle luggage rack packs; baskets adapted for bicycles | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Bicycle bags, namely, cycle bags in the nature of messenger bags mounting to a bicycle rack, rack mounted bags in the nature of all-purpose carrying bags, frame mounted bags in the nature of all-purpose carrying bags, seat bags in the nature of all-purpose carrying bags, handle bars bags in the nature of all-purpose carrying bags, reusable textile shopping bags for carrying goods on bicycles | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | [ Textile fabrics for use in the manufacture of bicycle bags; Textile fabrics for use in the manufacture of clothes; Textile fabrics for use in the manufacture of bags; Textile fabrics for use in the manufacture of baskets ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LTP SPORTS GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LTP SPORTS GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LTP SPORTS GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named OCEANWEAVE RECLAIMED FISHNET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 21, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2019 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 12, 2019 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 12, 2019 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |