CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for 60/40

USPTO serial 87158157

60/40

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 60/40?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Meredith Lowry

MEREDITH LOWRY WRIGHT LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP3333 PINNACLE HILLS PARKWAY SUITE 510ROGERS, AR 72758UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Weights for use with waterfowl hunting decoys; Waterfowl hunting decoysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 13, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 13, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 10, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 31, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 9, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 9, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 10, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 8, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance