USPTO serial 87158789
NETELASTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NETELASTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kim Larsen
KIM LARSEN LAW OFFICE OF KIM LARSEN1200 18TH STREET NW STE 700SUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20036-2531Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in computer network quality assurance monitoring and management; Computer software for use in network function virtualization and management in the context of software defined networking for service providers; computer software for use in managing or operating one or more cloud computing environments composed of computer, storage and networking resources, and network infrastructure systems for connecting hosted cloud environment services to end users | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering services in connection with telecommunications and data processing, namely, design and management of computer applications and information technology services for the Internet and web, intranet and network functions virtualization services; computer consultation services; computer software development services related to interoperability of infrastructures and software; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for management of computing resources and the delivery of computer applications and information technology services; technical support services, namely, management and optimization of workload migration in a distributed cloud topology; computer technology consulting services related to virtual infrastructure, storage and networking; managed information technology services and operations for others, namely, management of virtual infrastructure, networking and storage services; service provider services, namely, hosting, managing and administering computer software for others; technical support services, namely, trouble shooting of computer software and computer hardware; design, updating, maintenance, installation and rental of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |