USPTO serial 87159932
ZING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHLEGELMILCH, JONATHON A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R. Graif
MICHAEL R. GRAIF CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST, COLT & MOSLE LLP101 PARK AVENUE34TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10178Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on Intent to Use) Dried fruit-based snacks; nut based snack foods, namely, nut crisps and clusters; snack dips; vegetable based snack foods; dairy based beverages; dairy based spreads and dips; yogurt based dips and spreads; yogurt, greek yogurt; cottage cheese, cheese; grain based beverages; fruit chips; trail mix consisting primarily of nuts, seeds or dried fruit; trail mix consisting of rice and seeds; trail mix consisting of legumes; trail mix consisting of legumes and rice; trail mix consisting of nuts and seeds; trail mix consisting of nuts and dried fruit; dried vegetables, freeze dried vegetables; nut butters, nut spreads; nut butter substitutes made from sunflower seeds, sesame seeds; food bars comprised of whole grains such as oats, brown rice, millet amaranth, buckwheat; seed based snack bars; high protein nut based food bars; nut based beverages, namely, almond based beverages, peanut based beverages, walnut based beverages, macadamia based beverages, hazelnut based beverages, cashew based beverages, coconut based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Whole grain based snack foods, namely, bars, cookies, clusters; whole grain meals, namely, breakfast and lunch meals; oatmeal; granola; cereal; hot cereal; popcorn; salty snacks made with whole grain; yogurt covered fruit; cereal based energy bars; quinoa-based food bars; high protein cereal bars; cereal-based snack food clusters consisting primarily of whole grains, nuts, fruits, seeds and also containing other ingredients; energy gels comprised primarily of brown rice syrup, flour, and dried fruit; baked products, namely, ready-to-eat grain based food bars, high energy gels made primarily from dried cane syrup | ACTIVE | Jan 16, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |