USPTO serial 87160254
ANIMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANIMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marseille, FR
Marseille, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aaron Y. Silverstein
AARON Y. SILVERSTEIN SAUNDERS & SILVERSTEIN LLP14 CEDAR STREET, SUITE 224AMESBURY, MA 01913-1831UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable instructional manuals relating to the use of manipulative dolls as teaching aids to facilitate expression, communication, and interaction between people; data collection apparatus, namely, digital voice recorders; voice response equipment being loudspeakers; voice response equipment, namely, microphones; signaling apparatus and instruments, namely, magnetic signaling pictograms, luminous or mechanical used to facilitate non-verbal communication between individuals; data processing apparatus; interactive video apparatus, namely, webcams and microphones; electronic LCD display units; digital sensory devices, namely, motion detectors; electronic data recorders; mechanical signs; apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound or images, namely, video cameras; pre-recorded compact discs and DVDs featuring educational software applications; educational and communication software featuring instruction in communication techniques; game software; downloadable software applications for mobile phones and tablets for teaching personal expression, interpersonal communication, and interpersonal interaction; downloadable instruction manuals in electronic format in the fields of techniques of clear expression, communication, and exchange between people; downloadable educational course materials in the fields of techniques of clear expression, communication, and interaction between people; all the aforesaid goods being notably used in the field of enabling people to express themselves or express emotions, feelings and wishes during conferences, seminars, trainings, meetings, conferences, workshop, group work or any other events, increasing interaction and exchange in the context of these events, facilitating animation and guidance of groups and group work as part of the same events, fostering creativity and brainstorming in the context of these events, facilitating expression of young people or adults experiencing communication difficulties, and facilitating interaction and exchange between a therapist and patient | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Manipulative dolls used as teaching aids to facilitate expression, communication, and interaction between people; Controllers for toys, namely, controllers for electronic figurines in the nature of dolls; positionable toy figures; toy figures; play figures; scale model toy figurines; manipulative games; electronic educational teaching games machines; handheld electronic games units; mechanical games, being mechanical action toys; toys, namely, plastic character toys; toys in the nature of figurines adapted for educational purposes; electronic learning toys; puppets; plush toys; toy human characters figurines; plastic and rubber character toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |