USPTO serial 87165286
Serial No. 87165286
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AVENT, TEAGUE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 87165286?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhett V. Barney
RHETT V BARNEY LEE & HAYES PLLC601 W RIVERSIDE AVENUE SUITE 1400SPOKANE, WA 99201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technical consulting and assistance with computer-based information systems and components, namely, consultation on the design and development of emergency communication systems, digital signage systems, and mobile applications; Design for others in the field of computer networks, emergency communication systems, digital signage systems, and engineering for the purpose of facilitating organizational communication tools and gathering organizational data; Computer technology support services, namely, help desk services; Data mining | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 7, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |