Drawing for SILENT GARDENER

USPTO serial 87165717

SILENT GARDENER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILENT GARDENER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

April L. Besl

April L. Besl Dinsmore & Shohl LLP255 E. 5th Street, Suite 1900Cincinnati, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Non-woven polymer fabrics for landscape gardening useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 1, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 1, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 5, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 18, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 17, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 17, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 17, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 17, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 23, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 23, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 16, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance