USPTO serial 87165718
SILENT GARDENER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SILENT GARDENER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
April L. Besl
APRIL L BESL DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP255 E 5TH ST STE 1900CINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Non-woven polymer fabrics for landscape gardening use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 17, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 16, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |