Drawing for HIGHFLYER HUMAN RESOURCES

USPTO serial 87165872

HIGHFLYER HUMAN RESOURCES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARKER, JUSTINE D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIGHFLYER HUMAN RESOURCES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bernard F. Meroney

BERNARD F. MERONEY JONES WALKER LLP8555 UNITED PLAZA BLVD., 5TH FLOORBATON ROUGE, LA 70809UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Serving as a human resources department for others, namely, payroll processing services including payroll deductions, business records management in the nature of employee and family profile records for the benefit plans of others, workforce management, tracking employee expenses for cost accounting purposes, and employee time and attendance tracking for business purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 22, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 13, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 26, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance